Keynote talk at Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland March 2012

“Nurses’ talk about powerlessness and victimhood: slavery and jouissance”
Nurses are in distress, in the grip of a deep depression with far-reaching effects on the health service and nursing. The austerity measures underway in Ireland suggest the Government is aiming to take upto 35% of funding from the health services by 2014. This is an extraordinary measure and probably unprecedented in developed countries. A complete recruitment ban coupled with a drive for early retirement has left some services so understaffed that specialist nurses are being asked to return to the wards.

Places are being closed down. The fate of nurses is bound up with that of helpless, vulnerable patients . No one knows how nursing will look in 2014. What kind of hope can our middle and senior nurse managers glean for the future? Its nurse against nurse. Nurses are stabbing each other in the back. Where are the leaders to help us? Economic forces and the dominance of the medical establishment are overpowering nurses whose efforts and self-sacrifice go unrecognized by senior management and increasingly even by patients and their families. Through their dedication to their patients and their strong moral sense of duty nurses are exploited. Nurses are the slaves.

Wait a minute. This collection of phrases from nurses themselves is beginning to sound familiar. Reassuringly familiar. Familiarly reassuring. Haven’t we heard this before? Its not good but at least its not unfamiliar.

This morning I want to make this argument. Here’s a simple map of where I hope to go:

1 Nurses often express outrage
2 The context of nursing is widespread unrealistic expectation and fantasy
3 One way nurses avoid challenging the fantasy is by becoming a slave (and externalizing the disjunction between fantasy and reality)
4 Being a slave has payback
5 Health systems rely on nurses’ passivity for continued functioning
6 An alternative is to move away from a professional fantasy world

1 Nurses expressing outrage
I want to start by sharing with you something puzzling and paradoxical that has struck me in my research with nurses. In focus groups or interviews with nurses, over about 20 years and across continents nurses regularly talk in highly negative ways about nursing work yet this negativity is expressed with, or seems to produce, a high degree of energy and a kind of, well, a kind of self-destructive enjoyment. Let me give you an example. Here is just one of many I could chose, taken from an on-going PhD study with nurses in London by my colleague Chrysi Leliopoulou. These are experienced, senior nurses:
Nurse 1: …we’re…er… risking so much litigation. I mean the medical profession has always been very… powerful
Nurse 2: How many mistakes do doctors make and they never get any sanction or…or…
Nurse 1: No never sanction
Moderator: Yes.
Nurse 1: Nurses don’t have that at all. Nurses stab each other in the back.
Nurse 3: Also, we put up with a lot of these things that nurses go without breaks, they stay late and other professionals wouldn’t do that, you won’t get a secretary working through their coffee break.
Moderator: Why do we do it though?
Nurse 3: Because we’re conscientious….
Nurse 2: [I’m] Just thinking that we’re painting a really bad picture of nursing and it’s obviously something that’s making us stay in nursing.
Moderator: What is it? What is it keeping you going?
Nurse 2: It’s rewarding and… I think sometimes it’s quite a privilege to have been that intimate with a patient.
Nurse 1: You don’t always. Not necessarily. You can’t do anything else, I’m too old now.
Moderator: Really, you could change.
Nurse 1: But there’s always… Burn out. That is the danger of what we’re doing. We’re over-working, we’re at risk… we’re risking our health. We’re risking to burn out. And then our profession with… we’ve… we’ve lost it.
I am sure that most people here will recognise this kind of talk.

Recently I have begun to ask what light psychoanalytic explanations can shed on this strange observation and to ask what kind of unconscious factors might be at work in nurses’ words in this research. I am going to draw, this morning, on some of the ideas of Jacques Lacan and Slavoj Žižek, as well as the father of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud. In particular I plan to focus on a kind of enjoyment (Lacan’s word is jouissance) experienced by nurses in expressing and repeating a position of powerlessness and as ‘slave’ in healthcare systems. In the process I also offer some speculative explanations for the high-profile failures of nursing care that we have seen in the media with seemingly increasing frequency….

More to come

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Social scientist in peril

I got an email from a well-known medical sociologist this morning. In it he wrote, “I have been notified that my post is ‘at risk’ in a review exercise designed to shed my medical school of £3 million of salary bill. I take the view that the evaluation of my performance that this represents is misguided. More importantly, it threatens to end the future of medical sociology as a research discipline here at Barts and the London, and I intend to resist this. I am the holder of the ‘Sir Michael Perrin Chair of Medical Sociology’ here and this chair will not be funded if I depart. This would be a significant loss to the Centre and to the medical
school.” I haven’t anonymised his message and I asked him if I could talk about it on this blog.

His message contained both a succinct argument for the practical usefulness of medical sociology for improving the health and well-being of the local population served by his employer and an outline of a personal academic performance that many of us could only dream of. But for me it was the idea that the criteria valued by biomedical disciplines were being applied to social science work and failing to recognise, so it seems, its value or character, that struck a chord. I think this is a predicament that many social scientists working in nursing departments in biomedical faculties will find familiar.

“Sociology as a research discipline in this medical school: I work in east London, an area which contains exceptional levels of health need, much of it determined by social conditions that require understanding of the sort that sociology can provide. Much of the research that I and my collaborators are doing has direct relevance for our local population, as well as making significant contributions both nationally and internationally…

My own performance (he continues):
The medical school’s review criteria are narrow, being geared largely to the reward structures of biomedical disciplines. Social scientists do not easily fit into these. Interdisciplinary collaboration of the sort that delivers successful grant bids in primary care and public health appears to be poorly understood by the people leading the review.

Since 2008 I have published 25 refereed journal articles in sociology, medical and other kinds of journal, 7 book chapters and 2 books. I have participated in successful research grant bids worth £4,999,169, of which £3,524,116 are led by people within this medical school. I edit the world’s leading journal of medical sociology from the Centre, with a budget since 2006 of £439,097. I co-lead the Research Design Service here, which has a budget of £907,234 over 5 years, and is coming up for renewal.

Clive Seale, for that is who wrote the email, asks his contacts to express their views to key figures in his organization:

Professor Richard Trembath (head of the medical school) vp-health@qmul.ac.uk
Professor Mike Curtis (Blizard Institute Director) m.a.curtis@qmul.ac.uk
Professor Simon Gaskell (Principal of Queen Mary’s) principal@qmul.ac.uk

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

RCN Research Society Conference provisional programme

The provisional programme is out and at http://www.rcn.org.uk/development/researchanddevelopment/rs/research2012/programme
Now would be a great time to book if you are after a day’s attendance

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Nurses face impossible identities

There’s not a lot of social science, not explicitly, at any rate, in this analysis of nursing, passivity and the profession’s role in propping up system dysfunctions http://nurseresearcher.rcnpublishing.co.uk/campaigns/care-campaign/interview-michael-traynor/ and only an implicit call to psychoanalytic theory, but I hope there is some insight.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

the deadline approaches

The deadline to submit abstracts for the 2012 RCN Research Society Conference is Monday! Don’t miss it. The login is here: http://www.rcn.org.uk/_myrcn/onlinesubmission/register.php

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

RCN2012 deadline for abstracts

Send in your abstract for the RCN 2012 international nursing research conference
Just 27 days to go before the deadline to submit your abstract on contemporary research for this event in London in April 2012. Submit by 7 November 2011.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

RCN Research Conference 2012

From Dave O’Carroll: Call for papers for RCN 2012 research conference goes live on research website. The conference is taking place 23 – 25 April 2012, London, UK. Deadline for submitting abstracts is 07 November 2011. www.rcn.org.uk/research2012

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Nursing journals – is it just me?

Is it just me or is there something funny about nursing journals, not all of them, but some of them? Its about the number of hoops they ask you to jump through if you submit a paper. Its about the standard headings and sub-headings, the ‘implications for practice’ that you don’t dare leave out even when there aren’t any, its about being asked for certain information when its clearly not relevant. I suppose I shouldn’t bleat but it makes me think, first that there is an implicit assumption that papers submitted are a certain kind of – possibly clinical – paper, second that strict conformity of style is maybe equated with rigour of work, and third, (related to the first) there is a gradual identification with a biomedical model of research and publishing. Bibliometric work I did a while ago showed the pattern of published nursing research shifting from a single-authored, non-funded model to a multi-authored funded type of work. In one way this can be seen as nursing ‘coming of age’ as a research discipline but increasingly I wonder whether its research maturity is tending to be measured in one specific way – to the neglect of other ways of understanding the eclecticism of nursing research.

Yesterday I was sent the impact factor of the social science journal I edit, ‘health:’. We’ve gone up significantly – from 1.32 to 1.74. I know its not Nature but its pleasing. If you want to send us a paper, as long as its less than 8000 words and relevant to the journal, you can send us whatever the hell headings suit what you’ve done.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Closing remarks on the RCN research society conference 2011

What I value most about nursing research is its eclecticism and diversity – from clinical trials looking at specific interventions to studies employing sociological concepts to investigate some aspect of the lifeworlds of families, or methodological work about developing instruments to measure attitudes of relevance to nursing. There’s also ‘critical research’ that isn’t about trying to maximise performance within a given system but develops critiques of that system and how it got to be there – this is research we need to be part of.

One phrase that trips off the tongue easily is that all our research has the intention or the potential to improve patient care but I’d like to question this. It might be that research we do primarily aims to contribute to particular fields of knowledge – for example knowledge about how government policy is developed or implemented, or the changing character of professional work with nursing as its example. I would not want to see a hierarchy between these fields of knowledge or types of research. The only hierarchy I’d like to see concerns the importance of the research question and the rigour with which its been carried out.

My least favourite research is research which is entirely parochial, that sets out to address some local change that goes on to produce some conclusions that you might have thought were available from common sense and don’t contribute to any body of knowledge. What I think of as good research doesn’t necessarily need extra time – time seems to be such a scarce commodity when we hear some of our colleagues talk. For example, I attended a methods paper on the first day where the presenter, a nurse lecturer I think, told us she was at an organ recital one evening. The recital involved some address from the organist. He talked to the audience about the principles of transcription of orchestral scores to a score for a single instrument and how both melodic and harmonic aspects of a piece need to have justice done to them in this reduction. Natalie Yates-Bolton, the presenter, thought ‘yes this is the key to understanding how to approach analysis of complex qualitative data’ she’d gathered for her PhD, data from care home residents, and from professionals, from interviews and focus groups. She didn’t think, as we can probably imagine some of our colleagues thinking, ‘I’m not at work – I refuse to expend energy on anything that might be considered paid work’. Rather her intellectual project was completely engrossing – and probably reached into her dream life.

The way to avoid the parochialism I mentioned above, to make our research important, doesn’t need big grants and big studies necessarily or more time or special clothing. Its a question of intellectual ambition, imagination and vision, for example by seeing fieldwork, local data collection as an instance of some general or theoretical phenomenon right from the start to the finish of the research.

I think that this is the kind of research that Hefce is trying to identify and reward in its research assessment when its talking about research of international significance.

Next year’s conference is going to be in London and I have the scary honour of chairing the local organising committee. The dates will almost certainly be 23-25th April, 2012 and the venue looks like it may not be the one announced at Harrogate. I will post more details as the plans emerge.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Nursing Standard Nurse of the Year 2011

Last night I went to the Nursing Standard Nurse of the Year Awards. Its always a highly produced event, with light shows, smoke machines, loud music, a high profile presenter (Angela Rippon this year) and even massive fireworks. The purpose has always been to celebrate and publicise what’s good about nursing and individual nurses. Its Nursing Standard’s treat to the profession and particularly the winners and those shortlisted. Everyone obviously enjoys an evening of glamour and a nice meal. Strangely, this year it occurred the day after yet another blistering attack on poor quality nursing in the media. This time it was the columnist Christina Patterson on Radio 4 on Four Thought Care to be a nurse? (http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b010mrzt/Four_Thought_Series_2_Care_to_be_a_nurse/). Christina who had had breast cancer and then a reoccurrence told us in unsparing detail about her two stays in hospital, both featuring cruel – that was the word she used – nurses. She ended by saying there may be any number of structural explanations for the puzzle that people go into an apparently caring profession only to behave in a far from caring way, but she pointed to a fundamental personal responsibility. Each nurse had a decision to make either to be cruel or to be kind and if they did not like the work they could leave. Her harrowing personal account came as part of what seems like a growing media genre, the (often) secretly filmed experiences of vulnerable patients in hospitals and care homes in the UK at the hands of shockingly uncaring nurses. The sense of outrage seems to make good viewing.
At Nurse of the Year, awareness of this negative publicity was everywhere. Both Peter Carter, General Secretary of the RCN and Christine Beasley, Chief Nurse for England spoke about it with concern in their addresses. So did Angela Rippon. She talked about the ‘bad apples’ in nursing, as many people do. However, I felt there was something desperate this year to blow away these disturbing images of the profession. Was the music louder than ever before? Had there ever been such enormous fireworks at the climax of the show with glitter coming down from the ceiling? One of the prize-winners was a student nurse who had blown the whistle on an attempt to cover up a major drug error. She had found the experience so distressing that she had left the profession and had only recently returned to training. However, at the end of the evening when this year’s Nurse of the Year announced that she was proud to be a nurse, the entire audience shot to its feet in a standing ovation. Angela repeated this triumphant phrase once the applause had died down a little ‘and you should be proud to be a great profession’. Obviously her intentions were good but Shakespeare’s phrase about protesting too much came to mind. My visit, while at a nursing conference in Canada a little while back, with a nurse colleague, to a menswear shop also came to mind. After a little chatting we mentioned we were both nurses. The assistant looked us both in the eye (OK I know that’s not strictly possible) and said with utmost earnestness ‘That’s nothing to be ashamed of’ which I took to mean ‘actually I find it deeply shameful, particularly for men’.
Nursing is a dangerous profession – partly I suppose because women’s behaviour is considered a legitimate topic for public discussion and, usually, disapproval. But that is another issue.
As the director of nursing who was sitting next to me remarked when we were discussing these nursing failures early in the evening, ‘I have a theory about that’. ‘Yes’, I replied, ‘so do I’.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment